iPad test drive looks at speed, ease of use Seattle Times
30.01.10
The iPad has finally emerged from its secret hiding place, foretelling another 60 days of waiting. I had the opportunity at Wednesday's launch event in San Francisco to spend some substantial hands-on time with the iPad prototypes, and I have not yet decided where and whether the iPad fits into most people's lives. There's a more obvious hole for home Mac users than others.
The iPad is a remarkable device that plays video beautifully, has incredible responsiveness, and is one of the loveliest pieces of personal electronics I've ever seen. My principal impression from using the iPad was that it was fast — far faster than an iPhone 3GS or iPod touch, even with its much larger screen.
Whether you should buy an iPad is an entirely separate question from how it acts. It could be spectacularly useless and a commercial flop, but that doesn't change how fantastic it is. That said, the iPad seems most likely to be a device you carry as an adjunct to a primary computer that stores all your media — a kind of bulk-free laptop that doesn't necessarily replace a laptop.
The 16GB to 64GB storage available on the range of Wi-Fi only and Wi-Fi plus 3G models won't be enough if you regularly rent or purchase digital movies and music, or you have large music, video, and photo collections. You would dock an iPad to charge it, but also to change the assortment of media you have on it and sync back anything you purchased on the iPad.
The iPad comes with an enhanced Photos application that pulls down information from iPhoto running on the computer on which the iPad syncs via iTunes. iTunes does this now with the iPhone OS devices, but dumps pictures into big pools.
On the iPad, albums, events (photos grouped around a period of time), faces (a facial-recognition option), and places (geographically tagged photos) all appear. The iPad also can import photos directly via either of two $29 dock adapters, sold separately: one has a USB jack for direct camera connections; the other has an SD card slot. You can import photos, but exporting requires a sync; the Photos app doesn't let you create or upload galleries. Third-party software could come in handy there.
Apple demonstrated iPad versions of its $79 iWork suite for Mac OS X: Keynote (presentations), Numbers (spreadsheets), and Pages (word processing and layout). The versions worked remarkably well, far better than I could have guessed from seeing the demo. For those used to any of these programs on a Mac, these $9.99-each add-ons will be completely familiar. Files can be moved back and forth via an iPad shared folder on a USB-connected Mac, or via the underutilized iWork.com site Apple halfheartedly built to work with iWork.
The iPad seems pointedly aimed at those who wanted Apple to come out with a netbook — a cheap and very compact laptop — by being fast enough to run any Web-based applications, and by supporting either a keyboard that's part of a dock ($69, sold separately) or a Bluetooth keyboard connected wirelessly. The iPad, like its tinier iPhone/iPod touch counterparts, relies on touch so there's no option for a mouse with that keyboard.
I have trouble predicting whether with a real keyboard on demand and the strictures of running only Apple-vetted software from the iTunes App Store or Web apps, iPad would be enough to replace a laptop on a personal or business trip.
However, for those with train or bus commutes who want an in-transit option that's got the advantages of an iPod touch or iPhone with a screen designed for reading and watching movies, the iPad could fill a need — and be far cheaper than a laptop with the advantage of longer battery life. (Battery life is only as reported by Apple so far, of course: 10 hours of playing video on a single charge, according to Chief Exeuctive Steve Jobs in his iPad presentation.)
It also will be great in cramped quarters for frequent air travelers. As my colleague Derrick Story, a computer-book editor turned photographer, wrote on Twitter, "The iPad: finally a device for Mac users who fly coach and want to get their work done." Having been unable to fully open my MacBook on the flight home Wednesday, he makes a good point. I would have accepted the iPad's trade off to get work done more comfortably.
In 60 days, we should have a clearer idea of whether iPad fills a hole in people's pocketbooks or is a hammer in search of a nail. Regardless, there's never been a prettier hammer.
Source: